Dear Sports Illustrated
Dear Sports Illustrated:
I am shocked—shocked!—that you have not included Raider Take in your online vote for the best Raiders fan site.
Sure, we’ve had our differences. Why, just yesterday, I called you the “mothership of the Raiders Haters.” If I were you, I wouldn’t like me, either.
But please pause to consider the larger journalistic causes of fairness and balance. Surely, as the mothership of the Raiders Haters, you want to expose your readers to some fairness and balance, right?
Hugs,
Raider Take
I am shocked—shocked!—that you have not included Raider Take in your online vote for the best Raiders fan site.
Sure, we’ve had our differences. Why, just yesterday, I called you the “mothership of the Raiders Haters.” If I were you, I wouldn’t like me, either.
But please pause to consider the larger journalistic causes of fairness and balance. Surely, as the mothership of the Raiders Haters, you want to expose your readers to some fairness and balance, right?
Hugs,
Raider Take
posted by Raider Take at 4:08 PM
3 Comments:
Hopefully Art is not reading SI but getting ready to comb the waiver wire for RG's and RT's. We look very solid in alot of areas but the right side has got to step up--Slater might have to suit up...
Interesting article. Re your comments on playcalling: Why would walsh call a play that the O-line just cannot handle yet? The QBs barely have enough time to spit let along hold onto the ball. This is why the Nation is calling for Walsh's head! It's just stupid to call plays that assumes our O-line will give us time.....
Peace
KRaider
www1020
christian louboutin shoes
longchamp outlet
off white shoes
ugg outlet
adidas nmd
kate spade outlet
coach outlet factory
kate spade outlet
ralph lauren polo
moncler jackets
Post a Comment
<< Home